-- Posted by craziredbeauty13 at 1:52 pm on May 24, 2008 okkk so im buying a new cell and theres these two phones im torn between. theyre the exact same price, just different brands. the one by kyocera is way cooler, but it has less talk time which i need cause i use my phone constantly, you know texting, being out a lot, etc. the samsung one isnt as cool, but more talk time so, its between the samsung and kyocera; is any particular brand better overall? thanks for the help! p.s cricket is my sevice provider and yeah sucky sevice, but its cheap. idk if that has anything to do with the phones but yeahh... -- Posted by kk327 at 1:53 pm on May 24, 2008 um, check if they are both quadband.  if not go with the one that is.  i know for a while razrs weren't quad-band.  and they got sucky reception.  but other than that i have no clue. -- Posted by Tavis at 1:53 pm on May 24, 2008 I've never heard of kyocera, so I'm assuming that the samsung is better, because if it's good, it will make money, therefore, expanding who buys it and it's advertisements. -- Posted by vampireprintzess at 1:55 pm on May 24, 2008 The samsung has better signal and it's a more reliable phone. You're better of with that. -- Posted by Ftkatyowser at 2:12 pm on May 24, 2008 go with samsung, all my phones have een a samsung and haven't had a problem with them^^